NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 11.2 billion / sec versus 2.8 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 268.8 gflops versus 134.4 gflops
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 603 versus 426
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 versus 189
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2223 versus 1161
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.396 versus 3.121
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 versus 660
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 versus 1158
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 versus 660
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 versus 1158
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 October 2010 versus 3 September 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec versus 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops versus 134.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 versus 426 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 versus 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2223 versus 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 versus 3.121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 versus 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 versus 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 versus 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 versus 1158 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Environ 2% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1048 MB versus 1 GB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.787 versus 87.094
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 8.55 versus 3.764
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1048 MB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 versus 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.55 versus 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 versus 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 versus 1624 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 | 426 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2223 | 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 | 3.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.094 | 109.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.764 | 8.55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1624 | 1626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 | 1626 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 11 October 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1505 | 1526 |
| Prix maintenant | $35.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA par GPU | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
