NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs ATI Radeon HD 4670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

ATI Radeon HD 4670

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 750 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
Around 69% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 59 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 536 vs 380
4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 38

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 January 2011 vs 10 September 2008
Core clock speed	1300 MHz vs 750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 59 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	536 vs 380
PassMark - G2D Mark	176 vs 38

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670

3.1x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
Around 92% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 1524
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 1524

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	24 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Pipelines	320 vs 96
Floating-point performance	480.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3285 vs 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3285 vs 1524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

536

380

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

176

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1524

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1524

3285

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M	ATI Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark	536	380
PassMark - G2D Mark	176	38
Geekbench - OpenCL	2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1524	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1524	3285

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M	ATI Radeon HD 4670
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale
Code name	GF106	RV730
Launch date	15 January 2011	10 September 2008
Place in performance rating	1433	1436
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$67
Technical info
Core clock speed	1300 MHz	750 MHz
CUDA cores	96
Floating-point performance	249.6 gflops	480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	96	320
Texture fill rate	7.8 billion / sec	24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	59 Watt
Transistor count	1,170 million	514 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		193 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12 API with Feature Level 12.1	10.1
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus