NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• Around 60% better floating-point performance: 249.6 gflops vs 156 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 90 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 536 vs 330
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 79

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• 2x more texture fill rate: 15.6 billion / sec vs 7.8 billion / sec
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2239 vs 1524
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2239 vs 1524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 330
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	176 79
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 2239
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 2239

Compare specifications (specs)