AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon HD 6570

NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

2x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
2.5x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 550 vs 536
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 176
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.278 vs 4.25
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 929
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1524
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 929
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1524

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	15.6 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Pipelines	480 vs 96
Floating-point performance	624.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Memory clock speed	900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	550 vs 536
PassMark - G2D Mark	216 vs 176
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.278 vs 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1296 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2716 vs 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1296 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2716 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2012 vs 1550
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 vs 1044
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 1044

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2012 vs 1550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1210 vs 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1210 vs 1044

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

550

536

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

216

176

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1550

2012

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.278

4.25

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1296

929

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1044

1210

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2716

1524

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1296

929

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1044

1210

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2716

1524

Name	AMD Radeon HD 6570	NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark	550	536
PassMark - G2D Mark	216	176
Geekbench - OpenCL	1550	2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.278	4.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1296	929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1044	1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2716	1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1296	929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1044	1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2716	1524
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	846

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 6570	NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	Thames	GF106
Design	AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series
Launch date	7 February 2011	15 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$79
Place in performance rating	1432	1433
Price now	$49.99
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	19.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	624.0 gflops	249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	480	96
Stream Processors	480
Texture fill rate	15.6 GTexel / s	7.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	716 million	1,170 million
Core clock speed		1300 MHz
CUDA cores		96
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	11	12 API with Feature Level 12.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus