AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- 2x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 vs 536
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 176
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.278 vs 4.25
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 929
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1524
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 929
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1524
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 551 vs 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 176 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 vs 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2012 vs 1564
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 vs 1044
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 1044
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2012 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1210 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 vs 1044 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 551 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 1524 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Thames | GF106 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch date | 7 February 2011 | 15 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Place in performance rating | 1432 | 1433 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 96 |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1,170 million |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |