AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

  • 2x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
  • 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 vs 536
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 176
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.278 vs 4.25
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 929
  • Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1524
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 929
  • Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1524
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 480 vs 96
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 551 vs 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 217 vs 176
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.278 vs 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1296 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2716 vs 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1296 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2716 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

  • Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2012 vs 1564
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 vs 1044
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 1044
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2012 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1210 vs 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1210 vs 1044

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
551
536
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
217
176
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.278
4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1296
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1044
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2716
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1296
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1044
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2716
1524
Name AMD Radeon HD 6570 NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark 551 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 217 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 1564 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.278 4.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1296 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1044 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2716 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1296 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1044 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2716 1524
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 846

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6570 NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi
Code name Thames GF106
Design AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series
Launch date 7 February 2011 15 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $79
Place in performance rating 1432 1433
Price now $49.99
Type Desktop Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 19.92

Technical info

Boost clock speed 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 480 96
Stream Processors 480
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s 7.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 716 million 1,170 million
Core clock speed 1300 MHz
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 2.1 x16
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 11 12 API with Feature Level 12.1
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus