NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
  • 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
  • Around 23% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 692 vs 536
  • Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 176
  • Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 4.25
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 929
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1524
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 929
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1524
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 October 2012 vs 15 January 2011
Texture fill rate 12.75 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 192 vs 96
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 692 vs 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 288 vs 176
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.809 vs 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1211 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1720 vs 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1211 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1720 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

  • Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2012 vs 1706
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 vs 976
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 976
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2012 vs 1706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1210 vs 976
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1210 vs 976

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
692
536
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
288
176
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1706
2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.809
4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1211
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
976
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1211
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
976
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1524
Name NVIDIA NVS 510 NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark 692 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 288 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 1706 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.809 4.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1211 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 976 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1720 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1211 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 976 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1720 1524

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA NVS 510 NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK107 GF106
Launch date 23 October 2012 15 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $449
Place in performance rating 1430 1433
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 797 MHz 1300 MHz
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 96
Texture fill rate 12.75 GTexel / s 7.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API with Feature Level 12.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus