NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 692 vs 536
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 176
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 4.25
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 929
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1524
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 929
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1524
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs 15 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 692 vs 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 vs 176 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 vs 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 vs 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2012 vs 1706
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 vs 976
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 976
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2012 vs 1706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1210 vs 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 vs 976 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 692 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1706 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.522 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 | 1524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK107 | GF106 |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 | 15 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Place in performance rating | 1430 | 1433 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |