NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 696 vs 536
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 176
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 4.25
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 929
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1524
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 929
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2012 vs 1709
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 vs 976
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 976

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	696 536
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	288 176
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1524

Compare specifications (specs)