NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• Around 60% better floating-point performance: 249.6 gflops vs 156 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 539 vs 323
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 70

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

• 2x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6073 vs 1634
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3233 vs 1524
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3233 vs 1524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	539 323
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	187 70
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1634 6073
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 3233
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 3233

Compare specifications (specs)