NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M versus ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M and ATI Radeon HD 5670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 68% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1300 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1634 versus 694
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.25 versus 3.914
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1210 versus 1129
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 versus 1129
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 January 2011 versus 14 January 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1300 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1634 versus 694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.25 versus 3.914 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1210 versus 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 versus 1129 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Environ 99% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.5 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 96
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 620.0 gflops versus 249.6 gflops
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 805 versus 539
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 versus 187
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 versus 929
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2113 versus 1524
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 versus 929
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2113 versus 1524
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.5 GTexel / s versus 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 400 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops versus 249.6 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 805 versus 539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 versus 187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 versus 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 versus 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 versus 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 versus 1524 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 539 | 805 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1634 | 694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.25 | 3.914 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 929 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1210 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1524 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 929 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1524 | 2113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF106 | Redwood |
Date de sortie | 15 January 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1416 | 1417 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1300 MHz | 775 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Performance á point flottant | 249.6 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 7.8 billion / sec | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 627 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 400 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |