NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2860 vs 610
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 vs 3.914
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 184.557
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.727 vs 0.319
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1129
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 2113
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1129
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 2113

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670

• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 775 MHz vs 753 MHz
• 2.8x more pipelines: 400 vs 144
• Around 59% better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 388.8 gflops
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 803 vs 654
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 111
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.325 vs 21.909
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 1134
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 1134

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	654 803
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	111 288
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2860 610
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.699 3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.895 184.557
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.727 0.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.581 12.627
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.909 27.325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1134 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2265 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2827 2113
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1134 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2265 1129
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2827 2113

Compare specifications (specs)