NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M versus ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M and ATI Radeon HD 5670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 4.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2860 versus 610
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 versus 3.914
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 versus 184.557
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.727 versus 0.319
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 versus 1129
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 versus 2113
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 versus 1129
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 versus 2113
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 October 2011 versus 14 January 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2860 versus 610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 versus 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 versus 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 versus 0.319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 versus 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 versus 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 versus 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 versus 2113 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 775 MHz versus 753 MHz
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 144
- Environ 59% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 620.0 gflops versus 388.8 gflops
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 803 versus 654
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 versus 111
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.325 versus 21.909
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 versus 1134
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 versus 1134
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz versus 753 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 versus 144 |
Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops versus 388.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 803 versus 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 versus 111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 versus 12.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 versus 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 versus 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 versus 1134 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 | 803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2860 | 610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 | 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 | 2113 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF106 | Redwood |
Date de sortie | 27 October 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1417 | 1420 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | 775 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Performance á point flottant | 388.8 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 400 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 627 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 400 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.5 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |