NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M und ATI Radeon HD 5670 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 83% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2915 vs 693
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 vs 3.914
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 184.557
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.727 vs 0.319
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1129
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 2113
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1129
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 2113
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 27 October 2011 vs 14 January 2010 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2915 vs 693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 vs 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 vs 184.557 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 vs 0.319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 vs 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 vs 2113 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 775 MHz vs 753 MHz
- 2.8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 400 vs 144
- Etwa 59% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 620.0 gflops vs 388.8 gflops
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 vs 653
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 112
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.325 vs 21.909
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 1134
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 1134
| Spezifikationen | |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 775 MHz vs 753 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 400 vs 144 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 620.0 gflops vs 388.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 vs 653 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 vs 112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 vs 12.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 vs 21.909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 vs 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 vs 1134 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 | 801 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 | 291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2915 | 693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 | 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | 184.557 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | 0.319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | 12.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 | 27.325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 | 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 | 1129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 | 2113 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Codename | GF106 | Redwood |
| Startdatum | 27 October 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1424 | 1427 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $119 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 753 MHz | 775 MHz |
| CUDA-Kerne | Up to 144 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 388.8 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 144 | 400 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,170 million | 627 million |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 775 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 400 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 15.5 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
| Länge | 168 mm | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Speichertyp | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 64 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||

