NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M und ATI Radeon HD 5670 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 83% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2876 vs 602
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 vs 3.914
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 184.557
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.727 vs 0.319
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1129
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 2113
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1129
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 2113
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 27 October 2011 vs 14 January 2010 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2876 vs 602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 vs 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 vs 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 vs 0.319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 vs 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 vs 2113 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 775 MHz vs 753 MHz
- 2.8x mehr Leitungssysteme: 400 vs 144
- Etwa 59% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 620.0 gflops vs 388.8 gflops
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 803 vs 654
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 111
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.325 vs 21.909
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 1134
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 1134
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 775 MHz vs 753 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 400 vs 144 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 620.0 gflops vs 388.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 803 vs 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 vs 111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 vs 12.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 vs 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 vs 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 vs 1134 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 | 803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2876 | 602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 | 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 | 2113 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Codename | GF106 | Redwood |
Startdatum | 27 October 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1417 | 1420 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $119 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 753 MHz | 775 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | Up to 144 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 388.8 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 144 | 400 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 64 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,170 million | 627 million |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 775 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 400 | |
Texturfüllrate | 15.5 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
Länge | 168 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Speichertyp | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Speicherbandbreite | 64 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |