NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1024 MB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 vs 56
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1024 MB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 vs 56 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 5.2x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 2.3x more pipelines: 112 vs 48
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- 900x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 322
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 835
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 1155
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 835
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 1155
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 6.5 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 vs 1155 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 3304 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF119 | G92 |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 21 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | $160 |
| Place in performance rating | 1626 | 1063 |
| Price now | $39.99 | $103.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | 8.86 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 48 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce G100 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 600
