NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 444 MHz
  • 3.2x more texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s
  • Around 89% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 383 vs 237
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 117
  • 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 vs 587
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 614 vs 415
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1162 vs 646
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1683 vs 1468
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 614 vs 415
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1162 vs 646
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1683 vs 1468
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2012 vs 20 June 2011
Core clock speed 700 MHz vs 444 MHz
Texture fill rate 11.2 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 268.8 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 49 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 383 vs 237
PassMark - G2D Mark 158 vs 117
Geekbench - OpenCL 1571 vs 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 614 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1162 vs 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1683 vs 1468
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 614 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1162 vs 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1683 vs 1468

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Pipelines 160 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 40 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
383
237
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
158
117
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1571
587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
614
415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1162
646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1683
1468
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
614
415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1162
646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1683
1468
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 383 237
PassMark - G2D Mark 158 117
Geekbench - OpenCL 1571 587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 83.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 614 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1162 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1683 1468
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 614 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1162 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1683 1468

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF108 WinterPark
Launch date 15 May 2012 20 June 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $39.99
Place in performance rating 1554 1555
Price now $39.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 13.32

Technical info

Core clock speed 700 MHz 444 MHz
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 268.8 gflops 142.08 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 32 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C
Pipelines 96 160
Texture fill rate 11.2 billion / sec 3.55 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 49 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,180 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Height 2.7" (6.9 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 IGP
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.2 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1.8 GB/s
Memory type DDR3 System Shared

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
CUDA