NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 444 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 383 vs 237
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 117
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 vs 587
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 614 vs 415
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1162 vs 646
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1683 vs 1468
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 614 vs 415
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1162 vs 646
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1683 vs 1468
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 20 June 2011 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 444 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 142.08 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 vs 237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 vs 117 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 vs 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 vs 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 vs 1468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 vs 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 vs 1468 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 117 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | 587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 1468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 1468 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | WinterPark |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 20 June 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1554 | 1555 |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 444 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 142.08 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 3.55 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |