NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 vs 1071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 vs 1071 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 49 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 516 vs 383
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 158
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2225 vs 1162
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2461 vs 1683
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2225 vs 1162
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2461 vs 1683
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 49 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 516 vs 383 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 vs 158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2461 vs 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 vs 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2461 vs 1683 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 636 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | 1071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 2225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 2461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 2225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 2461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 7.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 14 May 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1554 | 629 |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 650 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,200 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
