NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 96 vs 72
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 59
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 2 February 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 72 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 187.49 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 vs 59 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 1580x more memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 470 vs 383
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 1571
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2502 vs 1683
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 1683
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 49 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 470 vs 383 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 vs 1571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 vs 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 vs 1683 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 | 470 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 59 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 | 8132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 2502 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 2 February 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1554 | 1482 |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 540 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 187.49 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 72 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 43 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 175 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.28 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 vs
AMDRadeon R5 Graphics
