NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 376 vs 224
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 55
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 vs 224 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 vs 55 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 1580x more memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6543 vs 1555
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1814 vs 1683
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1814 vs 1683
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6543 vs 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1814 vs 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1814 vs 1683 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | 224 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 55 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1555 | 6543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 | 1814 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GT216 |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1550 | 1553 |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 8.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |