AMD Radeon R4 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
• 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 1532
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.721 vs 4.046
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.613 vs 83.907
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.445 vs 0.371
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 6.791
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 701 vs 614
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 1162
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1811 vs 1683
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 701 vs 614
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 1162
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1811 vs 1683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 377 vs 336
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 99
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 vs 13.097

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	336 377
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	99 159
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8386 1532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.721 4.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.613 83.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.445 0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.612 6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.097 17.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 1683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 1683

Compare specifications (specs)