NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M und NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 126 vs 88
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 960
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 960
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 23 August 2012 vs 5 January 2011 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 vs 88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 vs 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 vs 960 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- Etwa 2% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 258.05 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 479 vs 434
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2153 vs 2102
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 vs 4.233
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 161.144
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 vs 0.519
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 vs 7.151
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 vs 16.605
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1595
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 2392
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1595
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 2392
Spezifikationen | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 258.05 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 479 vs 434 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2153 vs 2102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 vs 4.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 vs 161.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 vs 0.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 vs 7.151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 vs 16.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 vs 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2701 vs 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 vs 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2701 vs 2392 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 434 | 479 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | 88 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2102 | 2153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Fermi | Fermi |
Codename | GF108 | GF108 |
Startdatum | 23 August 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1505 | 1507 |
Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 715 MHz | |
CUDA-Kerne | 96 | 96 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 253.4 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 96 | 96 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 585 million | 585 million |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 672 MHz | |
Texturfüllrate | 10.8 billion / sec | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | large |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Speicherbandbreite | 28.8 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | |
Technologien |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play |