NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 218
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 vs 374
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 543
• 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 218
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 vs 374
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 543

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

• 2.5x more pipelines: 240 vs 96
• Around 70% better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 998 vs 432
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 126
• Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3773 vs 2141
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 vs 4.233
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 vs 161.144
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.865 vs 0.519
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 vs 7.151
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 vs 16.605

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	432 998
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	126 315
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2141 3773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.233 10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.144 325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.519 0.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.151 13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.605 27.961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 543

Compare specifications (specs)