NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 127 vs 119
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1352
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 284.16 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 573 vs 436
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2351 vs 2102
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.651 vs 4.233
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 213.211 vs 161.144
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.624 vs 0.519
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.521 vs 7.151
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.978 vs 16.605
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1056 vs 1032
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 vs 1595
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1056 vs 1032
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 vs 1595

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	436 573
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	127 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2102 2351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.233 4.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.144 213.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.519 0.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.151 10.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.605 23.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1595 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1352

Compare specifications (specs)