Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 715 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 622 vs 434
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 126
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2381 vs 2102
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 4.233
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.873 vs 161.144
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 vs 0.519
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.675 vs 7.151

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

• 8x more pipelines: 96 vs 12
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.605 vs 15.094
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 902
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1595 vs 1333
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1786
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 902
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 vs 1333
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1786

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	622 434
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	162 126
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2381 2102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.381 4.233
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.873 161.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.081 0.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.675 7.151
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.094 16.605
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 1595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 1595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 2392

Compare specifications (specs)