NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 127 versus 119
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1352
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1352
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 versus 5 January 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 127 versus 119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 1352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 1352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 284.16 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 573 versus 436
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2351 versus 2102
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.651 versus 4.233
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 213.211 versus 161.144
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.624 versus 0.519
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.521 versus 7.151
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.978 versus 16.605
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1056 versus 1032
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 1595
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1056 versus 1032
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 1595
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 573 versus 436 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2351 versus 2102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.651 versus 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 213.211 versus 161.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.624 versus 0.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.521 versus 7.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.978 versus 16.605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1056 versus 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 versus 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1056 versus 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 versus 1595 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 436 | 573 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 127 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2102 | 2351 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 4.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 213.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.624 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | 10.521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 23.978 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 1056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 1352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 1056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 1352 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 23 August 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1505 | 1508 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 284.16 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 740 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
