NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 192 gflops
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 434 vs 396
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 vs 90
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2121 vs 1583
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.519 vs 0.426
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.605 vs 12.306
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1032 vs 737
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 vs 737
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 August 2012 vs 3 September 2010 |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 434 vs 396 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 vs 90 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2121 vs 1583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 vs 0.426 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 vs 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 vs 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 vs 737 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.329 vs 4.233
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.162 vs 161.144
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1595
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 vs 2392
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1595
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 vs 2392
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 vs 4.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.162 vs 161.144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 vs 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 vs 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 vs 1595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 vs 2392 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 434 | 396 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 90 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2121 | 1583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.233 | 4.329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.144 | 162.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.426 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.151 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 | 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1032 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1595 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 | 2906 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 | 2906 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF108 | GF108 |
Launch date | 23 August 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1507 | 1510 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 96 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 6.0 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |