NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM and ATI FirePro V3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 43 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 356 vs 321
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 179
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2013 vs 26 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 874 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 43 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 356 vs 321 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 vs 179 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
- 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.432 vs 2.857
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1572 vs 1102
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2958 vs 2918
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1572 vs 1102
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2958 vs 2918
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 167.8 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.432 vs 2.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1572 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2958 vs 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1572 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2958 vs 2918 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V3800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | ATI FirePro V3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 356 | 321 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 179 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.857 | 3.432 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 629 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1102 | 1572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2918 | 2958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 629 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1102 | 1572 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2918 | 2958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 153.019 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.552 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | ATI FirePro V3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF119 | Redwood |
Launch date | 18 February 2013 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1408 | 1411 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 874 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 6.992 GTexel / s | 13 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 43 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |