NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 91
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.857 vs 2.47
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2013 vs 17 February 2012 |
Core clock speed | 874 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 vs 91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.857 vs 2.47 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 480 vs 48
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 473 vs 353
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1416 vs 1345
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 vs 629
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2194 vs 1102
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 2918
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 vs 629
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2194 vs 1102
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 2918
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 167.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 473 vs 353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1416 vs 1345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2194 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2194 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 2918 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 353 | 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1345 | 1416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.857 | 2.47 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 629 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1102 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2918 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 629 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1102 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2918 | 3341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.901 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF119 | Thames |
Launch date | 18 February 2013 | 17 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1401 | 1404 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $629.99 | |
Price now | $629.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 874 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 6.992 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, (GDDR5) |
Shared memory | 0 |