NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 55% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2918 vs 2297
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2918 vs 2297

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 February 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	874 MHz vs 850 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	29 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2918 vs 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2918 vs 2297

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
Around 95% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 352
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 189
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1739 vs 1345
Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 vs 2.857
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 629
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1102
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 629
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1102

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 48
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	778 vs 352
PassMark - G2D Mark	249 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	1739 vs 1345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.636 vs 2.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1162 vs 629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695 vs 1102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1162 vs 629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695 vs 1102

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

352

778

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

249

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1345

1739

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.857

4.636

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

629

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1102

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2918

2297

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

629

1162

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1102

1695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2918

2297

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	352	778
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	249
Geekbench - OpenCL	1345	1739
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.857	4.636
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	629	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1102	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2918	2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	629	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1102	1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2918	2297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		10.485

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GF119	GK107
Launch date	18 February 2013	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	1401	1402
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$119.90
Price now		$149.90
Value for money (0-100)		6.18
Technical info
Core clock speed	874 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	167.8 gflops	326.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	192
Texture fill rate	6.992 GTexel / s	13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	29 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	13.2 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0