NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 55% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2918 vs 2297
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2918 vs 2297

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

• Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
• Around 95% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 779 vs 353
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 188
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1717 vs 1345
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 vs 2.857
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 629
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1102
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 629
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1102

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	353 779
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	188 250
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1345 1717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.857 4.636
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	629 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1102 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	629 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1102 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 2297

Compare specifications (specs)