NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 55% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2918 vs 2297
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2918 vs 2297
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 February 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed 874 MHz vs 850 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 29 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2918 vs 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2918 vs 2297

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

  • Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
  • Around 95% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 352
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 189
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1719 vs 1345
  • Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 vs 2.857
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 629
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1102
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 629
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1102
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 13.6 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 48
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 778 vs 352
PassMark - G2D Mark 249 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL 1719 vs 1345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.636 vs 2.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1162 vs 629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1695 vs 1102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1162 vs 629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1695 vs 1102

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
352
778
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
189
249
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1345
1719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.857
4.636
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
629
1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1102
1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2918
2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
629
1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1102
1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2918
2297
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 352 778
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 249
Geekbench - OpenCL 1345 1719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.857 4.636
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 629 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1102 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2918 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 629 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1102 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2918 2297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.485

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Kepler
Code name GF119 GK107
Launch date 18 February 2013 1 June 2012
Place in performance rating 1401 1402
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $119.90
Price now $149.90
Value for money (0-100) 6.18

Technical info

Core clock speed 874 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 167.8 gflops 326.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 192
Texture fill rate 6.992 GTexel / s 13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 29 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 13.2 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1650 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0