NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 versus 150
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 versus 150 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- Environ 51% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 167.8 gflops
- Environ 9% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 538 versus 352
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2401 versus 1345
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 versus 2.857
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 versus 629
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 1102
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2918
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 versus 629
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 1102
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2918
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 167.8 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 versus 352 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2401 versus 1345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 versus 2.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 versus 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 versus 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 versus 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 versus 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 2918 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 352 | 538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1345 | 2401 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.857 | 5.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 629 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1102 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2918 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 629 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1102 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2918 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF119 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1401 | 1403 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 874 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 167.8 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.992 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 13.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1650 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |