NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 144 vs 96
• Around 3% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 560 vs 535
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2489 vs 2056
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 vs 185.752
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.444
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 vs 8.848
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 vs 16.137
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 1255
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 2037
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 1255
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 2037

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 169
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.617 vs 5.332
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 899 vs 800
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 899 vs 800

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	560 535
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	169 230
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2489 2056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.332 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.545 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.635 0.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.932 8.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.728 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	800 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2418 2037
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	800 899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1255
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2418 2037

Compare specifications (specs)