NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M versus NVIDIA Quadro 600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and NVIDIA Quadro 600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 144 versus 96
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 245.76 gflops
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 40 Watt
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 561 versus 533
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2544 versus 2070
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 185.752
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.526
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 9.023
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 versus 16.137
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 1255
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 2037
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 1255
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 2037
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 13 December 2010 |
Pipelines | 144 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 245.76 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 561 versus 533 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2544 versus 2070 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 185.752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 versus 0.526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 versus 9.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 versus 16.137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 versus 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 2037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 2037 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 versus 170
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.617 versus 5.332
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 899 versus 800
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 899 versus 800
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 versus 170 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 versus 5.332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 versus 800 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | NVIDIA Quadro 600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 561 | 533 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 170 | 232 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2544 | 2070 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 | 5.617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 | 185.752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | 0.526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 | 9.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 | 16.137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | 899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 2037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | 899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 1255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 2037 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF116 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 13 December 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1463 | 1466 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Prix maintenant | $299 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 2.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 245.76 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 40 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 585 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 640 MHz | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.24 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |