NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 28.86 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1175 vs 1092
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 224
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.448 vs 8.17
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 vs 2070
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 vs 1679
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3077
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 vs 2070
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 vs 1679
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3077
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2012 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1175 vs 1092 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 vs 224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 vs 8.17 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 vs 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 vs 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 3077 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.971 vs 206.777
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.86 vs 0.792
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.108 vs 14.637
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.606 vs 20.86
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 vs 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.86 vs 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 vs 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 vs 20.86 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1175 | 1092 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 224 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | 8.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | 585.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | 0.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | 20.108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | 98.606 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 | 1679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Broadway |
Launch date | 5 June 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1200 |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HDMI 1.3a |