NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 902 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.86 GTexel / s versus 28 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1173 versus 1092
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 versus 223
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.448 versus 8.17
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 versus 2070
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 versus 1679
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 3077
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 versus 2070
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 versus 1679
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 3077
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2012 versus 7 January 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 902 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.86 GTexel / s versus 28 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1173 versus 1092 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 versus 223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 versus 8.17 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 versus 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 versus 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 3077 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 384
- Environ 62% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,120.0 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.971 versus 206.777
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.86 versus 0.792
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.108 versus 14.637
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.606 versus 20.86
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,120.0 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 versus 206.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.86 versus 0.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 versus 14.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 versus 20.86 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1173 | 1092 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 223 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3762 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | 8.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | 585.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | 0.86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | 20.108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | 98.606 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3077 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Broadway |
| Date de sortie | 5 June 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1163 | 1206 |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 902 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.86 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3400
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
