NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 28.86 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 266
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 vs 1857
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 vs 1857

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1274 vs 1173
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4769 vs 3762
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.598 vs 11.448
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 404.618 vs 206.777
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 vs 0.792
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 vs 14.637
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.123 vs 20.86
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2375
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2375

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1173 1274
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	295 266
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3762 4769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.448 13.598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	206.777 404.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.792 1.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.637 25.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.86 44.123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2134 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2375 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2134 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2375 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3341

Compare specifications (specs)