NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 28.86 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1170 vs 462
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 175
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 2485
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 2485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 vs 1 November 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1170 vs 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 vs 175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 2485 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1170 | 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 175 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3771 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 2485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 2485 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G92 |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 | 1 November 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1158 | 1160 |
| Price now | $59.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 240 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M365X
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
