NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
- Around 91% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 362.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1170 vs 556
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 134
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 vs 1 July 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 675 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 362.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1170 vs 556 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 vs 134 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 28.86 GTexel / s
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3328
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3328
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 28.86 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1170 | 556 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 134 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3771 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G92B |
| Launch date | 5 June 2012 | 1 July 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1158 | 1159 |
| Price now | $59.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 362.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s | 37.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 229 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 240 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M365X
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
