NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 775 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1921 vs 694
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 3.914
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 vs 0.319
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1129
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1129
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 14 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1921 vs 694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 vs 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 vs 0.319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 1129 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 15.5 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 4000x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 802 vs 631
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 212
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 184.557 vs 100.391
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.627 vs 8.146
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.325 vs 20.64
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 977
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2113 vs 1833
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 977
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2113 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 802 vs 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 vs 212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 vs 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 vs 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 802 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1921 | 694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2113 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK208B | Redwood |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 14 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | $119 |
Place in performance rating | 1484 | 1418 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 775 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 627 million |
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 400 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |