NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1922 versus 694
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 versus 3.914
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 versus 0.319
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 1129
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 1129
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 14 January 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1922 versus 694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 versus 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 versus 0.319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1129 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.5 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 192
- Environ 69% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 620.0 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- 4000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 803 versus 631
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 versus 212
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 184.557 versus 100.391
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.627 versus 8.146
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.325 versus 20.64
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 versus 977
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2113 versus 1833
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 versus 977
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2113 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.5 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 620.0 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 803 versus 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 versus 212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2113 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2113 versus 1833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1922 | 694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2113 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK208B | Redwood |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 14 January 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | $119 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1484 | 1418 |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 775 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 627 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 400 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |