NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 134.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 95% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1048 MB
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 426
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 189
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 vs 1161
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 3.121
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 vs 5.005
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 8.55
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 660
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1158
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1626
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 660
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1158
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1626
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 3 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 134.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1048 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 vs 1161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 vs 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 vs 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 vs 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 vs 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 vs 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 vs 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 1626 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- 1800x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.787 vs 100.391
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 vs 100.391 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 1161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 1626 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208B | GF108 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1526 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1048 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |