NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.26 GTexel / s versus 2.8 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 48
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 366.3 gflops versus 134.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 95% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1048 MB
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 versus 426
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 189
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 versus 1161
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 versus 3.121
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 versus 5.005
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 versus 8.55
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 versus 660
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 1158
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 versus 1626
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 660
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 1158
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 versus 1626
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 3 September 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s versus 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops versus 134.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1048 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 versus 426 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 versus 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 versus 3.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 versus 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 versus 8.55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 versus 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 versus 1626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 versus 1626 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- 1800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.787 versus 100.391
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 versus 100.391 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 426 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 3.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 109.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 8.55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 1626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 1626 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK208B | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 1526 |
| Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 320M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AMDFirePro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
