NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
• 4x more pipelines: 192 vs 48
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 155.52 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 29 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB (DDR3)
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 319
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 136
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 vs 1277
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 vs 2.597
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 100.391 vs 76.214
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 vs 0.239
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 vs 5.862
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 4.574
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 545
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 903
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1455
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 545
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 903
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1455

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

• Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 954 MHz
• 900x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 1.8 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 319
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	212 136
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1946 1277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.705 2.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.391 76.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.441 0.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.146 5.862
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.64 4.574
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 545
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 903
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 545
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 903
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1455

Compare specifications (specs)