NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 106 Watt
Launch date | 29 September 2014 vs 13 September 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 vs 631
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 vs 208
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 vs 2224
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 4.418
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 vs 142.734
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.965 vs 0.395
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 vs 8.158
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.656 vs 17.317
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 895
- 12x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 280
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 519
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 895
- 12x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 280
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 519
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 vs 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 vs 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 vs 2224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 vs 4.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 vs 142.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 vs 0.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 vs 8.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 vs 17.317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 vs 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 vs 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 631 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GK208B | GF106 |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 | 13 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 1590 | 1130 |
Price now | $54.99 | $64.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 1566 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | 192 |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | 100 °C |
Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB or 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |