NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 460 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 10.4x better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 29.44 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 38 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB or 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 613 vs 232
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 vs 71
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 460 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops vs 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB or 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 613 vs 232 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 vs 71 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 858 vs 519
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 858 vs 519
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 858 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 858 vs 519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 613 | 232 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 | 71 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 858 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GK208B | G84 |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 | 12 September 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 1594 | 1592 |
Price now | $54.99 | $89.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | 1.66 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 460 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 3.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 289 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 2x DVI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB or 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |