NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M versus AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 938 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.4 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 460 versus 427
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2609 versus 1091
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 versus 3.109
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.587 versus 0.333
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 versus 905
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 1797
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 905
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 1797
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 7 January 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 500 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 460 versus 427 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2609 versus 1091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 versus 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.587 versus 0.333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 versus 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 versus 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 versus 1797 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570M
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 96
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 480.0 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 13 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 versus 119
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 199.164 versus 146.913
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.489 versus 10.121
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 versus 22.755
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 versus 2035
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 versus 2035
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 400 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 480.0 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 versus 119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 199.164 versus 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.489 versus 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.722 versus 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2352 versus 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2352 versus 2035 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | AMD Radeon HD 7570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 460 | 427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2609 | 1091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 | 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.913 | 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.587 | 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 | 42.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2035 | 2352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 | 2352 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | AMD Radeon HD 7570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF117 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 7 January 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1444 | 1447 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz | 650 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 500 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 13 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |