NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 938 MHz vs 753 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2621 vs 2565
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 vs 5.332
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 vs 800
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 1833
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 vs 800
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 1833

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 144 vs 96
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 vs 457
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 119
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 vs 146.913
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.587
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 vs 10.121
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 2035
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 2035

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	457 554
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 171
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2621 2565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.901 5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	146.913 205.545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.587 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.121 10.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.755 22.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2570 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2035 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2570 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2035 2418

Compare specifications (specs)