NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 938 MHz versus 753 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2621 versus 2565
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 versus 5.332
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 versus 800
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 versus 1833
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 versus 800
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz versus 753 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2621 versus 2565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 versus 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 versus 22.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 versus 1833 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 144 versus 96
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 554 versus 457
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 versus 119
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 146.913
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.587
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.932 versus 10.121
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 2035
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 2035
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 144 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 554 versus 457 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 versus 119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 versus 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 versus 10.121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 2035 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 554 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2621 | 2565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.901 | 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.913 | 205.545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.587 | 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 10.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 | 22.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2035 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 | 2418 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF117 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1446 | 1449 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 938 MHz | 753 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 144 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |