NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 vs 548
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 194
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 vs 162.886
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1119
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 1284
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 2264
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1119
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 1284
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 2264
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 1 November 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 vs 548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 vs 162.886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 2264 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 2902
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 10.872
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.817
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 12.415
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 36.916
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4936 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 vs 36.916 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 4936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 13.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 19.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 77.819 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2264 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GF108 | Oland |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 1 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1406 |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |