NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- Around 67% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 416.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 135 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 836 vs 568
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 77
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 11 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 416.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 135 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 836 vs 568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 249 vs 77 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 41.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1640 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 3324
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 3324
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 3324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 836 | 568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 249 | 77 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2912 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G92 |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 11 December 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 1318 | 1315 |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 416.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 41.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 135 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 254 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 52.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1640 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |