NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
  • Around 47% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 470.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 141 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 833 vs 494
  • 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 252 vs 83
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 June 2014 vs 16 January 2009
Pipelines 384 vs 128
Floating-point performance 692.7 gflops vs 470.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 49 Watt vs 141 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 833 vs 494
PassMark - G2D Mark 252 vs 83
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3324 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3324 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

  • 2.6x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 700 MHz
  • 3.3x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
  • 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.055 vs 10.872
  • 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.986 vs 0.817
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.56 vs 12.415
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.412 vs 36.916
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1836 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate 47.2 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.055 vs 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.986 vs 0.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.56 vs 12.415
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 108.412 vs 36.916

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
833
494
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
252
83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.872
54.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.817
4.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.415
15.56
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
36.916
108.412
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3324
3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3324
3309
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
PassMark - G3D Mark 833 494
PassMark - G2D Mark 252 83
Geekbench - OpenCL 2900
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.872 54.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 166.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.817 4.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.415 15.56
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 36.916 108.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3324 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3324 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 327

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla
Code name GF108 G92B
Launch date 18 June 2014 16 January 2009
Launch price (MSRP) $59.99 $229
Place in performance rating 1311 1314
Price now $54.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 20.48

Technical info

Core clock speed 700 MHz 1836 MHz
Floating-point performance 692.7 gflops 470.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 384 128
Texture fill rate 14.43 GTexel / s 47.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 49 Watt 141 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 754 million
CUDA cores 128
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options 2-way3-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 40.1 GB / s 70.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1100 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI