NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 vs 591
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 54
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 4 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 387.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 vs 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 54 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3108 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3324
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3108 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3324
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 54 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G92B |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 4 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1021 |
| Price now | $54.99 | $114.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 9.91 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1836 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 47.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7600G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M435DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 5
