NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 106 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 vs 27.656
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 13 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 106 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 vs 27.656 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 vs 830
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 vs 253
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 vs 2902
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 10.872
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 vs 166.832
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.965 vs 0.817
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 vs 12.415
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 vs 1951
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 1693
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 vs 1951
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 1693
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 vs 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 vs 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 vs 2902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 vs 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 vs 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 vs 0.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 vs 12.415 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 310 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 4907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 14.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 302.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 14.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 27.656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF108 | GF106 |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 13 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 1311 | 1130 |
| Price now | $54.99 | $64.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
