NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 601.3 gflops
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 106 Watt
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 27.656
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 13 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 601.3 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 106 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 27.656 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 74% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.1 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 versus 830
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 versus 253
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 versus 2902
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 versus 10.872
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 302.509 versus 166.832
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.965 versus 0.817
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.925 versus 12.415
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 1951
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 1693
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 1951
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 1693
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.1 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 versus 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 3324 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 13 September 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1130 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $64.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |