NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 320x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 9 October 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 830
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 253
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 2902
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 10.872
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 166.832
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 0.817
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 vs 12.415
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 vs 36.916
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1693
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1693
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 vs 327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 2527 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 7900 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 592.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 47.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 3948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | GF108 | GK106 |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 9 October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 846 |
Price now | $54.99 | $169.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 18.72 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 928 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 1,425 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 59.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |